Aristotle vs. Demosthenes from this versus that

 

Aristotle vs. Demosthenes

What's the Difference?

Aristotle and Demosthenes were both influential figures in ancient Greece, but they had very different areas of expertise. Aristotle was a philosopher and scientist, known for his contributions to logic, ethics, and metaphysics. Demosthenes, on the other hand, was a prominent statesman and orator, famous for his powerful speeches and political influence. While Aristotle focused on abstract concepts and theoretical knowledge, Demosthenes was more concerned with practical matters and the art of persuasion. Despite their differences, both men left a lasting impact on Greek society and continue to be studied and admired to this day.

Comparison

Attribute	Aristotle	Demosthenes
Philosopher	Yes	Yes
Orator	No	Yes
Teacher	Yes	No
Politician	No	Yes

Further Detail

Background

Aristotle and Demosthenes were two prominent figures in ancient Greece, each known for their unique attributes and contributions to society. Aristotle, born in 384 BC, was a philosopher and polymath who made significant contributions to various fields such as ethics, metaphysics, politics, and logic. Demosthenes, born in 384 BC as well, was a prominent statesman and orator known for his powerful speeches and political influence in Athens.

Intellectual Abilities

Aristotle was known for his exceptional intellectual abilities and his wide-ranging knowledge in various disciplines. He was a student of Plato and went on to become the teacher of Alexander the Great. Aristotle's works on logic, ethics, and metaphysics have had a lasting impact on Western philosophy. In contrast, Demosthenes was known for his exceptional oratory skills and his ability to persuade and influence audiences through his speeches. He was considered one of the greatest orators of ancient Greece and played a significant role in shaping Athenian politics.

Philosophical Contributions

Aristotle's philosophical contributions are vast and have had a profound influence on Western thought. His works on ethics, politics, and metaphysics laid the foundation for many philosophical concepts that are still studied and debated today. Aristotle's emphasis on virtue ethics and the importance of living a virtuous life has been a central theme in Western moral philosophy. On the other hand, Demosthenes' contributions were more focused on political rhetoric and the art of persuasion. His speeches were known for their powerful and persuasive language, which helped him gain influence and support in Athenian politics.

Political Influence

While Aristotle was not directly involved in politics, his political philosophy has had a lasting impact on political theory and practice. His works on politics and governance have been studied and debated by scholars for centuries. Aristotle's ideas on democracy, citizenship, and the role of the state have influenced political thinkers throughout history. In contrast, Demosthenes was actively involved in Athenian politics and played a significant role in shaping the political landscape of his time. His speeches against Philip II of Macedon and his efforts to rally support against foreign invasion were instrumental in shaping Athenian politics.

Legacy

Aristotle's legacy as a philosopher and thinker is undeniable. His works have been studied and revered for centuries, and his influence can be seen in various fields such as ethics, politics, and science. Aristotle's emphasis on reason, logic, and virtue continues to be a central theme in Western philosophy. Demosthenes' legacy as an orator and statesman is also significant. His speeches are still studied for their rhetorical techniques and persuasive language, and his influence on Athenian politics is well-documented.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Aristotle and Demosthenes were two prominent figures in ancient Greece known for their unique attributes and contributions to society. While Aristotle was a philosopher and polymath known for his intellectual abilities and philosophical contributions, Demosthenes was a statesman and orator known for his powerful speeches and political influence. Both figures have left a lasting legacy in their respective fields and continue to be studied and revered for their contributions to society.

From Physics by Aristotle

  

04:54 minutes left to register for free

when the objects of an inquiry, in any department, have principles, conditions, or elements, it is through acquaintance with these that knowledge, that is to say scientific knowledge, is attained. For we do not think that we know a thing until we are acquainted with its primary conditions or first principles, and have carried our analysis as far as its simplest elements. Plainly therefore in the science of Nature, as in other branches of study, our first task will be to try to determine what relates to its principles.

The natural way of doing this is to start from the things which are more knowable and obvious to us and proceed towards those which are clearer and more knowable by nature; for the same things are not 'knowable relatively to us' and 'knowable' without qualification. So in the present inquiry we must follow this method and advance from what is more obscure by nature, but clearer to us, towards what is more clear and more knowable by nature.

Now what is to us plain and obvious at first is rather confused masses, the elements and principles of which become known to us later by analysis. Thus we must advance from generalities to particulars; for it is a whole that is best known to sense-perception, and a generality is a kind of whole, comprehending many things within it, like parts. Much the same thing happens in the relation of the name to the formula. A name, e.g. 'round', means vaguely a sort of whole: its definition analyses this into its particular senses. Similarly a child begins by calling all men 'father', and all women 'mother', but later on distinguishes each of them.

Aristotle

 

Arisotle gravity

 

From the Almagest

From the Almagest:
It seems to me that these true philosophers, Syrus, very wisely separated the theoretical part of philosophy from the practical. For even if this happens, practicality will prove to be theoretical before it becomes practical, but one can find a great difference in them; not only because some moral virtues may belong to the everyday unconscious man and one cannot come to the theory of entire sciences without learning, but also because in practical matters the biggest advantage is the continuous and repeated operation of things in themselves, while in knowledge theoretical should be followed. Therefore, we thought about practicing our activities even in the application of imagination, not to forget about everything that would happen, taking into account their beautiful and well-ordered disposition, and devote ourselves to meditation mainly to make many beautiful statements, and especially those called mathematics.
 In fact, Aristotle quite correctly divides theory into three direct types: physical, mathematical and theological. Considering that all beings have their existence from matter, form and movement, and that none of them is visible, but only thoughts in their subject separately from others, if one should look in their simplicity for the first cause of the first cause by moving in the universe , he would consider God invisible and unchanging. And the science that seeks Him is theology; for such an act can only be considered high above somewhere near the highest things in the universe and is absolutely independent of reasonable things. But a kind of science that tracks this material and constantly moving quality and is related to white, warmth, sweetness, softness and such things would be called physics; and such an essence, because it is only what it is, is found in corrupt things and below the lunar sphere. And a kind of science that shows quality in terms of forms and local movements, character search, number and size, as well as place, time and similar things would be defined as mathematics. For such an essence falls somewhere between the other two, not only because it can be felt with both senses and without senses, but also because it is the case of absolutely all mortal and immortal beings, things that change with them always change , according to their irreversible form, and maintaining the unchangeable form immutability in eternal and ethereal things.